Scientific conduct.
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Desirable scientific conduct.
M any scientists are aware of the subtle influences on their own scientific conduct, but many others are not. Sydney Brenner, the joint winner of the 2002 Nobel Prize for physiology or medicine, delightfully described a slide in which data points were scattered very close to a straight line— but a large mysterious black object lay in one corner. By degrees, the onlooker realizes that the object...
متن کاملEthics : responsible scientific conduct 1 ’ 2
Nutrition researchers and practitioners may wonder what ethics has to do with their professional activities and investigations. Given widely held impressions about ethics, such questioning, not to speak of outright skepticism, is understandable. Ethics committees in the US Congress virtually identify ethics with the policing and censorship ofcongressional representatives for breaking house rule...
متن کاملAbortion and mental health: guidelines for proper scientific conduct ignored.
We have serious concerns about the methodology of the quantitative synthesis by Coleman 1 and want to highlight these to prevent readers and policy makers drawing erroneous conclusions, in particular the incorrect statement that 'nearly 10% of the incidence of mental health problems was shown to be attributable to abortion'. This quantitative synthesis and meta-analysis did not follow the robus...
متن کامل["Integrity in scientific research: creating an environment that promotes responsible conduct"].
Feel lonely? What about reading books? Book is one of the greatest friends to accompany while in your lonely time. When you have no friends and activities somewhere and sometimes, reading book can be a great choice. This is not only for spending the time, it will increase the knowledge. Of course the b=benefits to take will relate to what kind of book that you are reading. And now, we will conc...
متن کاملThe Researchers’ View of Scientific Rigor—Survey on the Conduct and Reporting of In Vivo Research
Reproducibility in animal research is alarmingly low, and a lack of scientific rigor has been proposed as a major cause. Systematic reviews found low reporting rates of measures against risks of bias (e.g., randomization, blinding), and a correlation between low reporting rates and overstated treatment effects. Reporting rates of measures against bias are thus used as a proxy measure for scient...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
سال: 1994
ISSN: 0027-8424,1091-6490
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.91.9.3479